|
Dr Keel Steed (1961)
Although
we don't have the materials necessary to properly evaluate Steed during
the Ian Hendry season, since unfortunately just only one of the 26 episodes
is available, we can however outline some highlights.
The character Patrick
Macnee played throughout 1961 lacked definition, though as the season
progressed, Steed's appearance would move from the mysterious and ill-defined
to something much nearer the Steed who we would soon come to know and
love.
However, two crucial
factors have to be considered at this point: in the first place Steed
wasn't the main character of the series at this time. Basically it was
a show for Hendry, sustained, according to Patrick, by the abilities and
the creativity of their mentor Sydney Newman, the directors, the designers,
and most particularly, of Hendry himself. Patrick said Hendry was "an
innovator, a wonderful artistic influence, a great and talented man."
He adds: "With Ian Hendry I never did anything consciously. I
just simply played it as myself." Nevertheless he puts a special
emphasis on the originality of the Hendry season episodes. Second, it's
perhaps obvious to point out that being a male pairing, the so-called
kinky factor which would be the main standard of the series after Hendry's
departure, was completely absent during that first year.
Two attributes were
granted to Steed during that first Hendry season (although we can't see
them now as they aren't shown in "The Frighteners," the only
available existing episode from that year); yet, both were visible frequently
during the following season, as well: the introduction of a bizarre superior
(code named "One-Ten"), as well as his love for the pet dogs
that lived with him in his apartment. We'll take care of them in the next
section.
Newman summed up the
main hallmarks of the two male characters, "Hendry, the moral
innocent" (Dr. Keel) and "Macnee, the amoral sophisticate"
(Steed). Another good description of the two characters is found in Dave
Rogers' book "The Complete Avengers": "Steed is the
professional undercover man. He is suave, debonair, a 'man-about-town'.
A sophisticate but not lacking in virility... (...)... He has an eye for
the beautiful and unusualbe it objets d'art or women... (...)... He
is an expert at his job, but not perfect...(...)... His motives are not
necessarily as 'moral' as Keel's. To him, the success of the mission is
the only important thing and therefore his means may sometimes be questionable.
The success of the mission, however, is 'a wrong put right' and therefore
sometimes necessitates these means being used to this end."
|