This logo always brings you back to the welcome page

Tara King: The Worst Of All?
Page 2 of 6

Click the bowler hat to begin a search

A Reflective Interval (also inevitable)
a) Art: transformation or calmness?
b) Is television an art form?
c) A few hypotheses

Steed becomes a British icon
Tara is caught eating Campbell's soup!

a) Art: Transformation Or Calmness?

My, if Warhol could see me now...One of the greatest challenges an artist should cope with, either individually or collectively, is to meet with their public's approval, despite the inevitable changes and transformations their work experiences in time. An artistic creation is always an indomitable force, that cannot be restricted to parameters other than its own creative dynamics. And it's indeed in this fidelity to its own origin where its freshness and power of communication resides.

However, for some strange reason we'll leave to psychologists, public tastes usually are more conservative than any eager creative power. To the purists' way of thinking, an ideal artist is the one whose work remains unalterable, stylistically speaking, throughout the years. If there is something that abounds in art history and showbiz, it is these permanent mix-ups between the public and artists. Want a few examples? Musicians who have resigned themselves to living in the shadow of an apparently "insuperable" earlier hit; bands becoming drastically disapproved of for including new members or replacing the old ones; film directors accused of treason for abandoning a sort of cinema they were typecast in easily; TV shows consigned to memory for having changed their habitual success formula.

Naturally, even though transformation is something inherent to artistic creation, it cannot be said that changes always guarantee quality or good artistic results. But the opposite cannot be stated either. In general, the public is averse to changes because that implies an instance of personal modification. Viewers have to fight their reluctance to get used to the new, and this irritability often generates a rejection of changes, leaving out any other possible consideration. It is easier to condemn than to change, and the major changes witnessed in The Avengers sixth season would not avoid this fate.

In addition, the show was changing not only as a result of internal dynamics, but also due to external factors. For hundreds of reasons—political and socio-cultural—the description of which would long exceed the scope of this article, 1968 began to become what John Lennon shortly afterwards summarized brilliantly in his "Dream is Over." The entire world said goodbye to the age of innocence, and the limpid, dreamy landscape of The Avengers began to face, for the first time, the restlessness of a nightmare.

Time gives us the chance of enhancing our vision of the series, covering it globally and showing its faults and successes more accurately. However, the negative response to changes, the lack of frames of reference, the general disagreement and the uncertainty about the future, turned out to be a hindrance. Such were the main problems the new avenging partners, Steed and Miss King, were faced with, on and off the set, as a sort of allegory of that outer world the series always ignored. Unfortunately, its recklessness would be insufficient to ward the growing fears off. Fear brings to a halt, and without dynamism, art becomes wilted.

But let's go on to try to better understand the genesis of this creative paralysis...

to page 3, Is Television An Art Form?
Top of Page
Table of Contents
Copyright of the written material is owned by its authors
Web Design and Digital Art © 2008 - TheAvengers.TV